As a result we get an outstanding balance among strings and a superior sustain and resonance.
It frustrates me when the department has made this political, so much more than it has to be.After years of research and development to improve sound transmission in electric guitars and basses, and due to the sound deficiencies they have (mainly related to the unbalanced sound among strings), we have developed and patented a system that notably improves the musical instrument sonority. "I don't think the citizens should have to sue the department to have a wolf hunt.
"I made my decision based on a lot of factors," he said. Prehn said he is not attempting to politicize the board or natural resources in general, even though he's been accused of doing so over the last several weeks. The department declined to comment on the ruling. "Now the question remains if the department will engage with this lawfully seated board," Prehn said. The board has not canceled a single meeting since 2000, and Prehn said he believed the lack of agenda items was political. Prehn's decision to remain on the board has created a tense atmosphere at meetings, and more recently, may have led to the cancellation of the September board meeting, after the Department of Natural Resources said there were no agenda items for discussion. More: Wisconsin Natural Resources board overrules DNR to set a wolf kill quota at 300 for fall season Prehn, a Wausau dentist and gun store owner, has said his decision to not step down isn't based on Naas not being qualified, but because he wants to stick around for certain votes. The statute Prehn is using to retain his seat has only been used two other times by board members: Jim Tiefenthaler Jr. If you follow my tenure on the board, I've always been a stickler for policy and governance and rule of law, and I felt that prevailed today," Prehn said in a Friday afternoon interview. "I've always thought my decision was based on the constitution and state statute. Bailey-Rihn said in the decision that statutory language upholds Prehn's argument. He's routinely used the 1964 court decision as a defense, which says a vacancy only occurs if there is a death, resignation, formal removal of an individual from a board, a conviction of treason, or if a member moves outside of the state.
More: Prehn corresponded with Republican leadership about decision to not step down from Natural Resources Board, emails show Prehn said he hopes the Senate will hold hearings, and if Naas is confirmed, he'll be happy to step aside. The state Senate has not acted to confirm Naas' appointment and Republican leaders have not responded to questions about whether they plan to hold any confirmation hearings. He has continued to chair board meetings and participate in votes since May, as Naas has watched from the public seating area. Tony Evers announced a new appointee - Sandra Dee Naas - at the end of April. Scott Walker, has repeatedly refused to step down from his position on the board after Democratic Gov. Kaul said Prehn was attempting to subvert the will of voters by not stepping down, and that his actions were "fundamentally undemocratic." Kaul filed the lawsuit in mid-August, asking the court to remove Prehn from the board, arguing he was occupying it unlawfully. Prehn is no longer a member of the Natural Resources Board, but the court concluded that, in light of precedent from 1964, such a ruling would have to be made by the Wisconsin Supreme Court," he said. “The court’s ruling makes clear that there are strong legal arguments for finding that Dr. In a statement, Attorney General Josh Kaul said the Department of Justice is already preparing to appeal the decision.